Like any charge, be it criminal or quasi criminal (traffic tickets) the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the offense. This means that the officer’s evidence must show that there is no doubt that you did commit the act you’re being charged with. This is very different than being involved in a civil case where the main objective is to show that the evidence is more probable then not (balance of probabilities).
In other words, a traffic matter puts the Defendant in a better position to win at trial as the prosecution must prove that you did it without any doubt, which isn’t that easy to do, if you can raise any doubt about the facts the officer is presenting the matter gets thrown out or withdrawn by the prosecutor, for example if the officer makes some kind of mistake regarding details of the event, you win vs a civil trial where both parties are trying to convince the judge who is more likely to be right, the fact is that no one will ever know 100 percent who is right and who is wrong, instead based on the evidence at trial the judge will put his best foot forward and pick a side he believes should win because that parties case is more probable to be true vs the other.
This is a major advantage to any Defendant who is being tried beyond a reasonable doubt and should not be taken lightly, when talking specifically about traffic matters there are some very negative impacts a traffic conviction can have on your life like the following;